THE LANCET • Vol 351 • February 21, 1998 541
Oral antifungal agents for
onychomycosis
Onychomycosis affects about
7–8% of the North
American population.1 It is commonly more than a
cosmetic issue since it can
cause pain or discomfort and
affect mobility as well as
other activities of daily living.2
An important advance in its
management is the
development of oral
antifungal agents and methods of
their administration.
…
The newer generation
of oral antifungal agents for the
treatment of
onychomycosis are terbinafine,8 itraconazole,
and fluconazole.
Itraconazole, a triazole, was first
approved for the
treatment of onychomycosis as a
continuous regimen
in Mexico in 1989.9 The concept of
pulse therapy was
soon introduced, because itraconazole
reaches the distal
end of the toenail within 2 weeks of
starting therapy
and persists in the nail plate for about
9–12 months from
the start of therapy, even though it is
present at low to
negligible concentrations in the plasma
within 7–14 days
after the end of a week of treatment.9,10
Itraconazole pulse
therapy was first approved for
onychomycosis in
1993, in Finland. Fluconazole, the
latest of the
newer antifungal agents for the treatment of
onychomycosis is
also a triazole.
Terbinafine,
itraconazole, and fluconazole enter the nail
plate via both the
nail matrix and nail bed. Like
itraconazole,terbinafine
and fluconazole can be found at
the distal end of
the nail plate within a few weeks of start
of therapy and
persist in the nail for several months after
withdrawal of
therapy.11-13 They are also eliminated from
the plasma within
weeks of the end of treatment. This
difference is
associated with a high benefit to risk ratio.
The persistence of
drug in the nail plate may explain why
the mycological
cure rates (60–80%) for the newer
agents are higher
than that of griseofulvin.6 The
pharmacokinetics
of these newer agents has enabled
shortening of
treatment duration, which increases
compliance.
Another advantage is that, unlike
griseofulvin,
which has activity against dermatophytes
only, the newer
agents are also active in vivo against
Candida species and some non-dermatophyte moulds.
Pharmacoeconomic
analyses of griseofulvin, terbinafine,
and itraconazole
(continuous or pulse) in the treatment of
onychomycosis of
the toes indicate that terbinafine and
pulse therapy with
itraconazole are the two most costeffective
treatments, with
no significant difference between them.6
For terbinafine
the recommended treatment regimen
for onychomycosis
of the toes is 250 mg/day for 12 weeks.
In a double-blind
trial 6 weeks of treatment was
compared with 12
weeks in patients in whom the
proximal part of
the toenails was not affected.14 Among
the patients who
completed the study, the mycological
cure rate at 48
weeks after the start of therapy in the 6-
week group was 56%
(34/61), compared with 82%
(46/56) for the
12-week group. Responders did not differ
from
non-responders in age, weight, or degree of nail
involvement. A
trend towards better response was
observed in those
with a short duration of disease and
with infection of
toenails other than the big (first) toenail.
Positive mycology
at week 24 predicted therapeutic
failure or relapse
in 68% (25/37) patients. The
investigators14 suggest that one
management approach
would be to check
mycological status 6 months after the
start of therapy
and then to repeat treatment for those
with positive
results.
With itraconazole,
despite the popularity of pulse
therapy, there has
been only one study that has compared
pulse (200 mg
twice daily for 1 week a month for 3
months) against
continuous therapy (200 mg daily for 3
months). At month
12 after the start of therapy,
mycological cure
rates were 69% for pulse therapy
(n=59) and 66% for continuous therapy (n=62).
In
patients with less
than 75% nail-plate involvement, the
mycological cure
rates at month 12 were 75% for pulse
therapy and 79%
for continuous therapy. When more
than 75% of the
nail plate was affected, the
corresponding figures
were 66% and 60%, respectively.15
Although there
were no significant differences, the
investigators
found a trend for superiority of the pulse
over the
continuous regimen. Furthermore, for
onychomycosis of
the toes, itraconazole pulse therapy
requires exactly
half the drug needed for the continuous
regimen, thus
making the former more cost-effective.
The newer oral antifungal
agents used alone, or in
some cases in conjunction
with topical antifungals or
surgery, are providing the
basis for effective treatment of
onychomycosis of the toes in
a large proportion of
affected individuals.
Efficacy can be improved if those
unikely to respond to therapy
can be identified, and
efforts to do so and to find
the most cost-effective
manner of treating pedal onychomycosis
are under way.
Recurrence of disease still
occurs in a high proportion of
patients. It can be due to
inadequate eradication of
onychomycosis or reinfection.
Hence once cure has been
obtained it is prudent to
counsel the patient about
measures that will reduce the
likelihood of reinfection.16
Some strategies include
avoidance of facilities with a
high level of dermatophyte
contamination (communal
swimming pools, showers,
changing facilities) discarding
old shoes that may have a
high density of fungal spores,
and the judicious use of
topical antifungal agents.
Aditya K Gupta,
*Richard K Scher
Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook
Health
Science Center, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
*Department of Dermatology, College of Physicians and
Surgeons,
Columbia University of New York, NY 10032, USA
1 Gupta AK, Jain HC, Lynde CW,Watteel GN, Summerbell RC.
Prevalence and epidemiology of unsuspected onychomycosis in
patients visiting dermatologists’ offices in Ontario,
Canada—a
multicenter survey of 2001 patients. Int J Dermatol 1997; 36:
783–87.
2 Scher RK. Onychomycosis is more than a cosmetic problem. Br J
Dermatol 1994; 130 (suppl
43): 15.
3 Gupta AK, Sauder DN, Shear NH. Antifungal agents: an
overview.
Part I. J Am Acad
Dermatol 1994; 30: 677–98.
4 Epstein WL, Riegelman S. Griseofulvin levels in stratum
corneum.
Arch Dermatol 1972; 106: 344–48.
5 Meinhof W. Kinetics and spectrum of activity of oral
antifungals: the
therapeutic implications. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993; 29:
S37–41.
6 Gupta AK. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of oral antifungal
therapies
used to treat dermatophyte onychomycosis of the toenails.
Pharmacoeconomics 1998; 13: 1–15.
7 Harris R, Jones HE, Artis WM. Orally administered
ketoconazole:
route of delivery to the human stratum corneum. Antimicrob Ag
Chemother 1983; 24: 876–82.
8 Gupta AK, Shear NH.Terbinafine: an update. J Am Acad Dermatol
1997; 37: 979–88.
9 De Doncker P, Gupta AK, Marynissen G, Stoffels P, Heremans
A.
Itraconazole pulse therapy for onychomycosis and dermatomycoses:
an
overview. J Am Acad
Dermatol 1997; 37: 969–74.
10 De Doncker P, Decroix J, Giérard GE, et al. Antifungal
pulse therapy
for onychomycosis: a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic
investigation of monthly cycles of 1-week pulse therapy with
itraconazole. Arch
Dermatol 1996; 132: 34–41.
11 Schatz F, Bräutigam M, Dobrowolski E, et al. Nail
incorporation
kinetics of terbinafine in onychomycosis patients. Clin Exp Dermatol
1995; 20: 377–83.
12 Cauwenbergh G, Degreef H, Heykants J,Woestenborghs R,
Van Rooy P, Haeverans K. Pharmacokinetic profile of orally
administered itraconazole in human skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;
18: 263–68.
13 Scher RK. A placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind
trial of
once-weekly fluconazole (150, 300, or 450 mg) in the
treatment of
distal subungual onychomycosis of the toenail. Presented at
the 37th
Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and
Chemotherapy
14 Tausch
I, Bräutigam M,Weidinger G, Jones TC, the Lagos V Study
Group.
Evaluation of 6 weeks treatment of terbinafine in tinea
unguium in
a double-blind trial comparing 6 and 12 weeks therapy.
Br J
Dermatol 1997; 136: 737–42.
15 Havu V,
Brandt H, Heikkilä H, et al. A double-blind, randomized
study
comparing itraconazole pulse therapy with continuous dosing for
the
treatment of toe-nail onychomycosis. Br J Dermatol 1997; 136:
230–34.
16 Gupta
AK, Scher RK. Management of onychomycosis: a North
American
perspective. Dermatol Ther 1997; 3: 58–65.
THE LANCET • Vol 351 • February 21, 1998 541

